> I'm going to commit:
> http://www.netbsd.org/~rpaulo/tcp_congctl.diff
> 
> in the upcoming week if there are no objections.
> The setsockopt() handling is not done yet, but I'm planing to add  
> that feature later.
> 
> --
> Rui Paulo

"cwnd_inflation" sounds weird to me, given that what it does is
ack handling for fast recovery.  otoh, "new_data_acked" inflates cwnd.
isn't it better to unify these two callbacks?

btw, where sack will be in the whole picture, eventually?

YAMAMOTO Takashi