On 31 Aug 2006, at 00:12, Daniel Carosone wrote:

> On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 05:54:09PM -0500, David Young wrote:
>> Browsing the source, I do not understand why any number of warn() and
>> warnx() calls are not err(EXIT_FAILURE,) and errx(EXIT_FAILURE,),  
>> instead.
>
> WAG: so that it will continue processing multiple configuration
> settings on the one command line, even when an earlier one fails?

Its actually not consistent in this manner.

		---
		Liam J. Foy
		<liamjfoy@netbsd.org>