Subject: Re: pool/spl cleanup in netinet, netinet6, net
To: None <>
From: Nathan J. Williams <>
List: tech-net
Date: 07/20/2006 12:53:24
Thor Lancelot Simon <> writes:

> Now I am looking at the pf code.  It looks as if there is an assumption
> in that code that only its timeout routines are ever entered not at
> splsoftnet -- but I am not sure that's true.  I really wish we had some
> better documentation of which parts of our network stack can and can't
> take which interrupts.

Or assertions, or even function annotations the compiler could
propagate..... while the latter might be a wild dream, having spl
assertions (which are hacked into a couple of places already) should
be a SMOP, right?

        - Nathan