Thor Lancelot Simon <tls@rek.tjls.com> writes:

> Now I am looking at the pf code.  It looks as if there is an assumption
> in that code that only its timeout routines are ever entered not at
> splsoftnet -- but I am not sure that's true.  I really wish we had some
> better documentation of which parts of our network stack can and can't
> take which interrupts.

Or assertions, or even function annotations the compiler could
propagate..... while the latter might be a wild dream, having spl
assertions (which are hacked into a couple of places already) should
be a SMOP, right?

        - Nathan