At Wed, 19 Jul 2006 22:15:17 -0400,
Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 11:30:59PM +0100, Rui Paulo wrote:
> > At Wed, 19 Jul 2006 17:27:26 -0400,
> > Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
> > > 
> > > The patch below attempts to clean up problems in net, netinet, and
> > > netinet6 where pool_get or pool_put may be called from an interrupt
> > > context but where there was no protection with spl*/splx.
> > 
> > I didn't see any problem.
> 
> Do you mean that there weren't any problems to begin with, or that the
> patch looked OK?
> 
> I am pretty sure there were some problems.  There were several instances
> where pool_put() was called just _after_ code went to elevated spl to
> protect element removal from a datastructure, then reduced spl again.  If
> it was necessary to go to splsoftnet() to protect a list operation, etc.
> it seems pretty clear that the adjacent pool operation also needed to be
> protected...

I meant I didn't see any problems with your patch.