On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 06:46:23PM -0500, Brad wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 03:34:27PM -0800, John Nemeth wrote:
> >      No, I'm not confusing anything.  I'm well aware that VRRP violates
> > Cisco's patent.  However, Cisco has publicly stated that they will not
> > prosecute anybody implementing it.  However, to my knowledge, they have
> > not made any comments about CARP.  So, my question stands:  de we know
> > if CARP violates Cisco's patent?
>  
> No, CARP does not violate Cisco's patent. It was designed specifically
> so it does not.

Any pointers to an analysis which would convince everybody?

Pavel
>