On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 08:58:58PM +0200, Mihai CHELARU wrote:
> <joerg@britannica.bec.de> wrote in message 
> news:<20060219180634.GA1900@britannica.bec.de>...
> >Doesn't answer the question which protocol number should be
> >used instead. Any suggestions?
> 
> 253 or 254 (RFC3692 s2.1) ?

"Shipping a product with a specific value pre-enabled would be
inappropriate and can lead to interoperability problems when the
chosen value collides with a different usage, as it someday surely will."

aka: it is not really better than the status quo.

Joerg