Subject: Re: ral(4) / ural(4) in NetBSD 2.1 or 3.0 ?
To: Geert Hendrickx <ghen@telenet.be>
From: Rui Paulo <rpaulo@fnop.net>
List: tech-net
Date: 10/23/2005 16:08:52
--6TrnltStXW4iwmi0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 2005.10.23 16:30:59 +0200, Geert Hendrickx wrote:
| On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 10:32:35PM +0200, iMil wrote:
| > it's settled then, i'll bring you full backport for ural/ral really soo=
n,
| > as i said the work is 99% done.
|=20
| Has it worked out yet? I have bought an ASUS WL-167G USB card for testin=
g.
| Right now I'm using it with a -current kernel on a 2.1 userland. Can it =
be
| pulled up to netbsd-2 now that 2.1 has been released? =20
No, it won't go to 2.1. Mabye, just maybe, we can put it on 2.2, but I
don't know. I'm not part of releng, nor I work on net80211.
-- Rui Paulo
--6TrnltStXW4iwmi0
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (NetBSD)
iD8DBQFDW6eEZPqyxs9FH4QRAj9EAKCDjC9FQWOYuDPpuN22r4u26nMV9QCePoab
oKlEmBKEtMZuxAUzHX80wLw=
=3xrq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--6TrnltStXW4iwmi0--