On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 01:57:44 +0000 (UTC)
jdev@panix.com (Jed Davis) wrote:

> In article <20050622004304.320663BFE99@berkshire.machshav.com>,
> Steven M. Bellovin <smb@cs.columbia.edu> wrote:
>
> > Option 2 is probably best, but we may want to rethink the table.  The 
> > current values are based on more-or-less obsolete hardware.
> 
> So... who wants to survey the modern Internet and publish a new RFC?

For a solution to the problem of untrustworthy probes and just a general
update of PMTUD stuff, see:

	http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pmtud-method-04.txt

Kevin
kml@patheticgeek.com