Subject: Re: SMP re-eetrancy in "bottom half" drivers
To: None <ups@tree.com>
From: YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamt@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp>
List: tech-net
Date: 05/18/2005 06:59:18
> > Yes; your old patch for i386 SMP effectively collapsed all SPLs to a
> > single level. That way, no driver should interrupt another.
>
> One level may be a little extreme since you may run into trouble with
> pmap operations in drivers that need interprocessor interrupts for TLB
> shootdowns.
> Serial devices (and others) may also take a dim few on the latency
> issues this may cause.
sure. the following is the hack part of the old patch.
YAMAMOTO Takashi
@@ -23,12 +26,22 @@
#define IPL_NONE 0x0 /* nothing */
#define IPL_SOFTCLOCK 0x4 /* timeouts */
#define IPL_SOFTNET 0x5 /* protocol stacks */
+#ifndef MULTIPROCESSOR
#define IPL_BIO 0x6 /* block I/O */
#define IPL_NET 0x7 /* network */
#define IPL_SOFTSERIAL 0x8 /* serial */
#define IPL_TTY 0x9 /* terminal */
#define IPL_VM 0xa /* memory allocation */
#define IPL_AUDIO 0xb /* audio */
+#else /* MULTIPROCESSOR */
+/* XXX XXX for locking order */
+#define IPL_BIO 0x7 /* block I/O */
+#define IPL_NET 0x7 /* network */
+#define IPL_SOFTSERIAL 0x7 /* serial */
+#define IPL_TTY 0x7 /* terminal */
+#define IPL_VM 0x7 /* memory allocation */
+#define IPL_AUDIO 0x7 /* audio */
+#endif /* MULTIPROCESSOR */
#define IPL_CLOCK 0xc /* clock */
#define IPL_SCHED IPL_CLOCK
#define IPL_HIGH 0xd /* everything */