--Y7xTucakfITjPcLV
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 01:25:09PM -0700, Jonathan Stone wrote:
>=20
> The biggest --- perhaps the only -- unresolved technical issue from
> last time this came up centered around locking and SPL issues.  My
> recollection is that there was a near-consensus that we'd need to move
> to a total ordering of locks and SPLs; but I may well be misremembering.

My understanding of this point was that there was no real way to avoid SPL=
=20
ordering, since there will be locks associated with SPL-protected code,=20
and those locks will need ordering to avoid deadlock.

Take care,

Bill

--Y7xTucakfITjPcLV
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFCim6ZWz+3JHUci9cRAi5OAJ4qd/fwcVVJGmDFcVDi97h9T91u6QCaApBp
xFG7o7P0oP3OItTzMb94h3w=
=V/bO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Y7xTucakfITjPcLV--