Subject: Re: if_pcn enhancement thoughts
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Ignatios Souvatzis <email@example.com>
Date: 05/05/2005 10:45:48
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 09:31:44PM -0400, Miles Nordin wrote:
> >>>>> "is" == Ignatios Souvatzis <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> is> more than one external PHY, but still disabling the internal
> is> one if any externals are there, is easy (see below). Should I
> is> go this way, or remove the test completely?
> there is an 'instance' architecture that lets you choose which of
> multiple PHYs or SERDES or whatever to use. Maybe use that?
yes, of course.
for my card, default instance == instance 0 is the acphy0 (the fiber port),
instance 1 is acphy1 (RJ45 port), and instance 2 is the internal 10 Mbit
only phy, that seems not to be connected.
If nobody objects, I would remove the test altogether, as proposed in my