On Apr 22, 2005, at 6:53 PM, Jonathan Stone wrote:

> No, but I have code that does.

...and I have code that correlates my spare parts inventory to my  
repair records for my old VW van.  Just because you have some code  
that does something doesn't mean its relevant to the discussion at  
hand.  I haven't seen a separate proposal for this code of yours yet.

> Nope. I state again, for for the record: the proposed change is
> *broken*. It should not be committed. If it is committed anyway, I
> fully intend to back it out as breaking Strong-ES as described in
> RFC-1122.  On that, you can fairly call me being rigid.

Well, that is something that will have to be discussed with Core  
before you take either action.

-- thorpej