On Wed, 6 Apr 2005 15:23:34 +1000
Daniel Carosone <dan@geek.com.au> wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 12:07:44AM -0400, Miles Nordin wrote:
> > >>>>> "dr" == Darren Reed <darrenr@NetBSD.org> writes:
> > 
> >     dr> One other question, if NAT were to support IPv6 also,
> > 
> > WHAT!  who is asking you for IPv6 NAT?
> 
> NAT is useful for a number of things, not all of which go away when
> the resource-shortage addressing issues of v4 are taken away.  
> 
> NAT can be useful as part of load balancing and fail-over solutions,
> as just one class of examples.

Hmmm.. These both examples may be implemented without NAT.

Possible there are other resources explained IPv6 NAT needs?

--
TIA, Mishka.