On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 07:30:53PM -0500, Dheeraj S wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 01:13:34PM -0600, David Young wrote:
> >>snipped<<
> > Dheeraj,
> > 
> > It looks to me like you are using IP subroutines (in_xxx) and IP protocol
> > control blocks (PCBs, inpcb).  I do not expect for that to work.  Also,
> > it is important not to have any arbitrary dependencies on the IP part
> > of the stack.
> > 
> > Dave
> > 
> 
> David,
>  I have attached, a new set of patches. without any dependency on the
> IP subroutines this time. Does this seem the right approach to support
> a larger set of functionality ?

It looks like you are on the right track.  Since you are doing this from
scratch, maybe you can write a "how-to" guide to adding a new protocol.

> PS: the way i am verifying it to work is have a simple ioctl to change the
> link-level address. Please suggest if i should have a different test case.

I did not see that part of the code.  It looks to me like _setpeeraddr
and _setsockaddr copy the addresses in the pcb to an mbuf?

Dave

-- 
David Young             OJC Technologies
dyoung@ojctech.com      Urbana, IL * (217) 278-3933