Subject: Re: some sack fixes
To: None <tech-net@NetBSD.org>
From: Kentaro A. Kurahone <kurahone@sigusr1.org>
List: tech-net
Date: 03/20/2005 09:42:53
--pvezYHf7grwyp3Bc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 07:57:30AM +0000, Kentaro A. Kurahone wrote:
> I went and ported over the changes that we were missing, I'd appreciate
> some feedback/review before I go and check it in. (Test rig is at work so
> it's kind of hard to test extensively right now.)
=20
Ok, I just went and cleaned up the sysctl stuff in that patch, mainly
by moving off the SACK related options into their own node.

net.inet.tcp.sack becomes net.inet.tcp.sack.enable under this new scheme.
Will anybody here have any objections to that?  (Since it's a relatively new
feature, I don't think that many people are using the sysctl yet but, it ne=
ver
hurts to ask.)

--=20
Kentaro A. Kurahone
SIGUSR1 Research and Development

--pvezYHf7grwyp3Bc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD)
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=PBlc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--pvezYHf7grwyp3Bc--