On Dec 1,  5:35pm, erplefoo@gmail.com (Sean Davis) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: clonable lo(4)

| I wouldn't mind bpf being something that you didn't need to specify a
| number for - I have, on numerous occasions, built a kernel for a
| machine with, say, 3 bpf devices, then later on discovered I need
| more.

Too late, I've already committed the changes for that in head. Bpf is a cloner
now.

christos