--=-=-=


Jason Thorpe <thorpej@shagadelic.org> writes:

> On Nov 23, 2004, at 1:28 AM, Richard Braun wrote:
>
>> I'm curious though : why not simply upgrade the KAME implementation ?
>> Does it still lack all these features ?
>
> Yes.  Basically, it seems as though development of racoon by KAME has
> all but ceased.

That seems to be case.

Love


From: Shoichi Sakane <sakane@kame.net>
Subject: (KAME-snap 8885) the development situation of the racoon
To: racoon@kame.net
Cc: snap-users@kame.net
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 23:58:23 +0900

This is the development situation of the racoon which is a
IKE daemon. I am not going to implement new feature to the
racoon, and will only fix bugs reported at racoon@kame.net.

The racoon2 is yet another key mangement daemon which
will support both IKEv2 and KINK, also support IKEv1.
I am going to concentrate to develop the racoon2.
I am planning to release the racoon2 pre-alpha version on Dec 25th.

Regards,


--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (NetBSD)
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=Whk4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--