Subject: Re: slashdot on 'OpenBSD Activism Shows Drivers Can Be Freed'
To: Henning Brauer <hb-netbsd-tech-net@bsws.de>
From: Thor Lancelot Simon <tls@rek.tjls.com>
List: tech-net
Date: 11/04/2004 07:04:44
On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 12:39:29PM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Dheeraj Reddy <dheeraj@ece.gatech.edu> [2004-11-04 11:16]:
> >   Anyone noticed this ??
> > 
> >   http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-cvs&m=109936481212412&w=2
> 
> as in, we have a completely free driver, without sam leffler 
> binary hal bs.
> 
> i tried to mention this 3 times in this thread, but some censorship is 
> going on, my maillogs show clearly the mails beeing accepted by the 
> netbsd mailserver and never appearing here.

Having just examined our mail logs, I don't see any evidence of any
"censorship" going on (which does not surprise me, since the only
filtering like that we do at all is a simple scan for spam words,
which bounces mail to the list owner).  I do think I should point out,
though, that you are being pretty rude to Sam; it's not *his* fault
that Atheros won't let him release the HAL source code.

One thing that comes to mind as perhaps delaying your mail is that our
mail server does greylisting; perhaps there's some bad interaction with
your mailer's retry interval?

-- 
 Thor Lancelot Simon	                                      tls@rek.tjls.com
   But as he knew no bad language, he had called him all the names of common
 objects that he could think of, and had screamed: "You lamp!  You towel!  You
 plate!" and so on.              --Sigmund Freud