Subject: Re: purpose of mbuf type MT_HEADER (see pr kern/24713)
To: None <>
From: Ignatios Souvatzis <>
List: tech-net
Date: 10/05/2004 11:42:47

On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 11:33:15AM +0200, Pavel Cahyna wrote:

> If the difference between MT_DATA and MT_PKTHDR is vaguely defined,
> why not keep the test and get rid of MT_PKTHDR completely and replace
> it with MT_DATA?

Discussing, defining and implementing this will surely need more time than
is left before 2.0.

seal your e-mail: