Subject: Re: tcpflow vs. lo0 on 2.0_BETA
To: None <cjs@cynic.net>
From: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino <itojun@itojun.org>
List: tech-net
Date: 08/19/2004 16:18:03 
> I'm having a lot of trouble with the pkgsrc tcpflow on NetBSD 2.0_BETA
> when sniffing lo0. It works fine on my ethernet card, but with lo0 I
> just get this (with -v):

	check if tcpflow supports non-ethernet interface.  my guess is that
	tcpflow supports ethernet frames, and not bpf encoding for lo0
	(4-byte address family).

itojun