2004-06-03 kl. 19.55 skrev Jason Thorpe:

> On Jun 3, 2004, at 4:03 AM, Johan Danielsson wrote:
>
>> Each protocol has to have a defined mechanism for how to locate its
>> service. You can't just stop or start using SRV on your own, so having
>> this switch under user control is rather meaningless. I think that an
>> AI_SRV flag is fine (and then it should only return SRV records). Next
>> step is to amend rfc2553 with it.
>
> I agree with Johan 100% here.

Well, I can live with that. Unless there's further opinions I guess the 
patch is finished then. Should I send a pr or what is the proper way to 
request it's inclusion?
-- 
Pelle Johansson
<morth@morth.org>