>> > Hey Greg,
>> >
>> > I haven't heard much new on this front (if so I would have
>> > updated the page)... there seems to be some resistence among
>> > certain NetBSD developers against it.
>>
>> Not against pf itself, but the way it interfaces with altq and ipsec.
>> We want to be able to use others packet classifiers than pf for theses.
>>
>> The ball is at the KAME peoples, I think they still need some changes to
>> altq to get done.
>
> correct.  we need some kernel-internal mods to altq before PF goes in.
> 	on my system PF is running just fine.
>
> itojun
>
Please could you be a bit more detailed?


Thanks
Roberto