> >While we throw away up to 3 random numbers each time we ask for a single
> >random number, we're always going to have a minimum gap of approximately
> >1/3rd the theoretical gap.
> 
> Its enough to make you weep. Well, me anyway.
> 
> There's an English proverb: ``once bitten, twice shy'', and a similar
> US phrase: ``fool me once shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me''.
> OpenBSD code in general, and this code in specific, is well into 
> ``shame on me'' territory -- at least for me.

	the documentation problem (let you believe the cycle was 36000 instead
	of 12000) was completely my responsibility.  do not blame OpenBSD
	for that.  blame ME.

itojun