Subject: Re: kernel ip_randomid() and libc randomid(3) still "broken"
To: None <jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU>
From: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino <itojun@itojun.org>
List: tech-net
Date: 11/26/2003 06:21:02 
> >> Getting all the book-keeping and pcb rundowns right is more than I
> >> wanted to buy into before we start the 2.0 release cycle.
> >	we could have multiple pcbs with same (src,dst) pair, so bookkeeping
> >	ip_id value on pcb does not look right to me (more work needs to be
> >	done).
> Exactly, that was well understood.  Why do you bring up this strawman?

	i may have commented into a message in the middle of the thread.  if so,
	apologies.

itojun