Subject: Re: kernel ip_randomid() and libc randomid(3) still "broken"
To: Jonathan Stone <jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU>
From: David Laight <david@l8s.co.uk>
List: tech-net
Date: 11/17/2003 22:47:21 
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 02:37:30PM -0800, Jonathan Stone wrote:
> >Surely it is enough to have one count per hash?
> 
> Depends if you're already worried about ip_id space wrapping when
> traffic is just between a single pair of hosts.  I do, and one count
> per hash isn't enough.

Then include the port number in the hash function.

	David

-- 
David Laight: david@l8s.co.uk