Subject: Re: kernel ip_randomid() and libc randomid(3) still "broken"
To: David Laight <david@l8s.co.uk>
From: Jonathan Stone <jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU>
List: tech-net
Date: 11/17/2003 14:37:30 
>Surely it is enough to have one count per hash?

Depends if you're already worried about ip_id space wrapping when
traffic is just between a single pair of hosts.  I do, and one count
per hash isn't enough.

Then again, I'm watching 10GbE prices like a hawk, waiting for
10GbE-CX4 adaptors to come out.