Subject: Re: Allowing large PPPoE frames
To: Quentin Garnier <netbsd@quatriemek.com>
From: Martin Husemann <martin@duskware.de>
List: tech-net
Date: 08/03/2003 15:50:16
On Sun, Aug 03, 2003 at 03:07:30PM +0200, Quentin Garnier wrote:
> After all, the ISP only gets sessions from the L2TP
> tunnel, with no distcintion if the client is using PPPoE, PPTP or PPPoA as
> a transport to the BAS.

I don't buy the "with no distinction" part, and if it is true, this setup
is braindead.

> So yes, it is a flaw in the design of
> PPPoE in the sense that it cannot work peacefully with other PPP
> transports.

The flaw in PPPoE is the small MTU (but it's hard to avoid in the general
case, given what PPPoE tries to do).

I would very much prefer to have a PPPoA connection instead of PPPoE over 
an ATM tunnel - and it's clearly a lack of clue at ISP/telco that forces
me to use PPPoE at all - IMHO.

Martin