Subject: RE: PF for netbsd
To: Martin Husemann <martin@duskware.de>
From: Sporleder, Matthew (CCI-Atlanta) <Matthew.Sporleder@cox.com>
List: tech-net
Date: 06/29/2003 19:27:37
Brach PF.  It's open source, right?


-----Original Message-----
From:	Martin Husemann [mailto:martin@duskware.de]
Sent:	Sat 6/28/2003 7:42 PM
To:	Sporleder, Matthew (CCI-Atlanta)
Cc:	itojun@iijlab.net; tech-net@netbsd.org
Subject:	Re: PF for netbsd
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 09:13:43PM -0400, Sporleder, Matthew =
(CCI-Atlanta) wrote:
> then why not
> accept the use of something that we have more control over instead=20
> of waiting on the ipf development to integrate a new feature?

I'm not sure what you realy mean, but PF does 100% fail to meet the =
"more
control" criteria - which is probably still quite an understatement.

Martin