Subject: Re: PF for netbsd
To: None <itojun@iijlab.net>
From: Sean Davis <dive@endersgame.net>
List: tech-net
Date: 06/28/2003 22:54:35
On Sun, Jun 29, 2003 at 11:40:33AM +0900, itojun@iijlab.net wrote:
> > i really hope this atmosphere to change. by working on KAME project
> > which is trying to create a good code that benefits all BSDs) i'm
> > trying to do so. KAME have made some improvements which needs PF (at
> > this moment), and i'm asking for permission to commit
> > PF-for-netbsd-current, as it is too painful to maintain local patch
> > myself (as said earlier i work on multiple platforms, current and
> > release w/kame, in parallel).
>
> also note that i'm not the only one who want PF on netbsd.
> (including Joel Wilsson)
I am not against PF for NetBSD, as long as it doesn't take the place of IPF.
I'm quite happy with IP Filter, and I personally think ALTQ should be able
to use either. If this requires modifications of the IPF code, well, Darren
should be able to what is needed.
-Sean
--
/~\ The ASCII
\ / Ribbon Campaign Sean Davis
X Against HTML aka dive
/ \ Email!