>] 	not sure.  freebsd has 2 packet filters (or 3?) shipped with it and
>] 	has no problem, so i'd say we can ship both.  but ipfilter and PF has
>] 	very similar syntax, so we could choose to replace ipfilter with PF.
>Yes, but requiring that one runs PF in order to use ALTQ is
>unacceptable.

	if ipfilter incorporates tagging functinality, you can run ALTQ with
	ipfilter.  until then, PF is needed for ALTQ.

itojun