itojun@iijlab.net writes:
] >] 	not sure.  freebsd has 2 packet filters (or 3?) shipped with it and
] >] 	has no problem, so i'd say we can ship both.  but ipfilter and PF has
] >] 	very similar syntax, so we could choose to replace ipfilter with PF.
] >Yes, but requiring that one runs PF in order to use ALTQ is
] >unacceptable.
] 
] 	if ipfilter incorporates tagging functinality, you can run ALTQ with
] 	ipfilter.  until then, PF is needed for ALTQ.

This wasn't required in 1.6.  ALTQ ships with, but PF does not.

-=erik.