Subject: Re: Replacing oddly networked NT machine
To: Johnny Billquist <bqt@update.uu.se>
From: Lubomir Sedlacik <salo@Xtrmntr.org>
List: tech-net
Date: 02/17/2003 14:10:46
--Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 02:06:14PM +0100, Johnny Billquist wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Stephen Borrill wrote:
>=20
> > On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Johnny Billquist wrote:
> > > You should really bridge them, in that case. Check bridge(4), and
> > > start playing. And ipf should work fine on this, by the way.
> >=20
> > Really? Since when? It seemed to be an FAQ about "why doesn't it
> > work when it does in OpenBSD?". Plus, I really want to use 1.6.* if
> > possible rather than -current.
>=20
> Hmmm, I noticed on the man-page that ipf don't work on the bridge
> device. However, bridge connects "normal" ethernet devices, and I
> thought that they should still be possible to set ipf rules on, but I
> might be wrong on that one. If so, then you loose. :-/

see http://mail-index.netbsd.org/source-changes/2003/02/15/0012.html


regards,

--=20
-- Lubomir Sedlacik <salo@Xtrmntr.org>                   --
--                  <salo@silcnet.org>                   --

--Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQE+UN9WiwjDDlS8cmMRAnrUAJ9ieZhOhZ0s/TM+5Nyq4Yem2nc4MwCeN2dm
NttxjrD41P1eUdd1qey8W0Y=
=J5+k
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi--