-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----


>>>>> "Matthias" == Matthias Scheler <tron@zhadum.de> writes:
    Matthias> Here is the "tcpdump" output:

    Matthias> 01:37:54.783820 PPPoE [ses 0x1ea4] 213.146.112.12 >
    Matthias> 128.107.240.254: 2002:d592:700c::1 >
    Matthias> 2001:4f8:4:b:2e0:81ff:fe21:6563: icmp6: echo request
    Matthias> 01:37:55.026903 PPPoE [ses 0x1ea4] 128.107.240.254 >
    Matthias> 213.146.112.12: 2001:4f8:4:b:2e0:81ff:fe21:6563 >
    Matthias> 2002:d592:700c::1: icmp6: echo reply

    Matthias> It looks fine for me. Does anybody know what's going wrong
    Matthias> here?

  Is this a tcpdump of the external ethernet, or of the pppoe?  Looks like
ethernet.
  Do a tcpdump of the pppoe interface, which should remove one layer.

  I see no reason why the ingress filtering should catch you, but perhaps it
has. Try toggling link2 on on stf0.

]       ON HUMILITY: to err is human. To moo, bovine.           |  firewalls  [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON    |net architect[
] mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
] panic("Just another Debian GNU/Linux using, kernel hacking, security guy"); [


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Finger me for keys

iQCVAwUBPkags4qHRg3pndX9AQHgQgP8CwnNIBa8XNHUUQ4IsNSYxm79y192C5x6
YqEe7pk/Ix96Fb1z7iR+vW1/bEwOHgeY+oqbINdjZd/KQRcsZCsGwGaRnfX2XklO
y1LxzSXjOVFTtGVwe8KWiq1CdSj8qGd9++nh9Eoxbx0wZZYySU1MGysC2CwvKS/2
7EwRrrO5yiU=
=ZrKM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----