-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On Mon, 10 Jun 2002 itojun@iijlab.net wrote:

> >	pls take a look at 17202 - if we apply this patch, we can depart from
> >	"inner address used for outer" model to "completely separate inner/
> >	outer address" model.  do people object about the change?  i understand
> >	there are backward compatibility concerns, and would like to know
> >	how people are using gre interface currently.
>
> 	to clarify -
> 	if people are using like this, we are okay to pull this change in.
> 	# ifconfig gre0 A B
> 	# greconfig -i gre0 -s C -d D
> 	(now 2nd command should be "ifconfig gre0 tunnel C D")

Thats what i've used everywhere i've used it (6 machines or so).

I also agree with your comment in the commit logs that configuring the outer
addresses after the innner ones is counter intuative.

- -- 
Information wants to be a lumberjack.
[http://pointless.net/]                                   [0x2ECA0975]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (NetBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iQEVAwUBPQS/KACB+Qwuygl1AQE95gf/ekvO8uveOlNR+cj3nQXP4JmtafQLBNhY
m1zMvrEYzCVPRBptCh9xspNX2kNDXXjAT+UzeQ+7nWU/ejimSTL3oWwCSzpnRdSL
ZQls46bRm6ZXcnIw/apZ2/rtVxA9KQqR1770t7zU4QtpJlHNQ/paWZ7UbHvhZ3eV
70dmUfLITj/0Eo63Q26deRzq2FA3Ri1stLyTMqv7coJMUMD2VuxAzrwomEX8GYPP
GqiC6/rvvf/M/KGr/Mp1KKEyoO14yJtnlY3Rlq+7445S6K+5OeLF3oy5/PT/X7RF
8U6z1Zmr1L3+jUeQuXsWApltFDXSoAwvEb2OYD5yLXMVspGwI6Pbag==
=MkAJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----