On May 9, 10:09am, itojun@iijlab.net (itojun@iijlab.net) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: PR 15662 (remove route when interface address goes away)

ok with me.

christos

| >	PR 15662 is already applied to -current, however i don't think it
| >	is doing the right thing.  kernel shouldn't be removing routes
| >	without user knowing it (for RTF_DYNAMIC/CLONED case, it should be
| >	okay, however, the code doe snot check it).  user can alter ia_ifa
| >	manually, therefore i guess we shouldn't even be updating ia_ifa.
| 
| 	i would like to back it out.  any objections?
| 
| itojun
-- End of excerpt from itojun@iijlab.net