Subject: Re: PR 15662 (remove route when interface address goes away)
To: None <tech-net@netbsd.org, christos@netbsd.org, msaitoh@netbsd.org>
From: None <itojun@iijlab.net>
List: tech-net
Date: 05/09/2002 10:09:45 
>	PR 15662 is already applied to -current, however i don't think it
>	is doing the right thing.  kernel shouldn't be removing routes
>	without user knowing it (for RTF_DYNAMIC/CLONED case, it should be
>	okay, however, the code doe snot check it).  user can alter ia_ifa
>	manually, therefore i guess we shouldn't even be updating ia_ifa.

	i would like to back it out.  any objections?

itojun