Subject: Re: pppoe problem
To: <>
From: Ignatios Souvatzis <ignatios@theory.cs.uni-bonn.de>
List: tech-net
Date: 12/19/2001 11:39:40
--Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 05:43:11AM +0000, Matthias Scheler wrote:
> In article <200112161335.fBGDZgv01110@night-porter.duskware.de>,
> 	Martin Husemann <martin@duskware.de> writes:
> > This, IMHO, shows that t-online can't be blamed for PMTU-D blackholes.
>=20
> But they can be blamed for not using DHCP like in the Pilot phase.

Well - they have to somehow account by time, and runnning PPP over
$somethingsick is the easiest solution, I guess...

Regards,
	-is

--Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.i

iQEVAgUBPCBuZzCn4om+4LhpAQHAvgf/TDXxahqtubqq+2D2KmKV0fQHa+Dr16cM
aktf3XeHfp2ANgCf4aBVZ59RU+PTTVcqAfMjuC2PTdVGSxQsLmeGrAdGweS35fjs
rmkGRSdm2ZZIry98anYDsNtrPliXKCL0o3LopQPVi9OCgybbvRAZttI3lkapFcw2
TOfJOlCik2CdPvBB+Wkua0wj+JZzaeTFwSZjYEEpdfbP8frs+b3VptfC5w6HiT+T
m1syIZgr/796DiENYkmkPKqHiKK1ZprYoSwELJocKFOnilMjztS0q8+P+64y/OdT
REnbSQZP2l931MWZpjRyhFl56VVJSvmNmdU5qpg6tPvJeu00pvZBqw==
=9+ey
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi--