>> 	we had a local discussion within KAME.  we do not really like to
>> 	support PF_LOCAL, unless there's clear standard behavior for AF_LOCAL
>> 	case.
>I think this is the wrong approach.  If we're always going to wait for
>a clear and standarized behaviour of something before implementing it,
>I'm afraid that this is not going to appear and if there is actually a
>standard for it, then it will have been written without the help of
>implementation and usage experience.

	we can probably try it out (if it seems really necessary for us)
	on KAME tree, but not on *BSD-current nor *BSD official releases.

itojun