One person has already misunderstood my note about am79900.c.

I was (am) not asking for review of a proposed patch; I'm offering a
suggestion to anyone else who has similar trouble.

I've also been told the patch doesn't apply cleanly, which as I
indicated is no surprise; however, apparently the sentence I added to
indicate where it went in that case wasn't clear enough.

Most briefly, the fix is to add lance_reset(sc) (and return(1), if
absent) to the code that prints "missed packet", which is when
LE_C0_MISS is set in am79900_intr.  (In every version of am79900.c I've
examined, there is only one such, and while the printf is conditional
on LEDEBUG, it does serve to indicate the point in question.)

I don't propose to commit it as it stands; if nothing else, I have no
particular reason to think it is innocuous on other chips that use
am79900.c.  It does fix a problem I ran into (as described in my first
message); if anyone else has a similar problem, it may be worth
considering.

/~\ The ASCII				der Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
 X  Against HTML	       mouse@rodents.montreal.qc.ca
/ \ Email!	     7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B