Subject: Re: better ARP handling in IPv4 alias address
To: Andrew Brown <atatat@atatdot.net>
From: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino <itojun@iijlab.net>
List: tech-net
Date: 07/04/2001 09:59:38 
>which is suboptimal, since i need the 206 address to be the "primary",
>and i've lost one of the aliases.  i guess i could just "assume" that
>the address being replaced is at the head...but i still think there
>ought to be a way to insert at the head.

	what i meant was that we should try to remove the special
	treatment of "primary".  it needs time, but it should happen.

itojun