"Charles M. Hannum" <root@ihack.net>  wrote:
 > * I have SERIOUS reservations about NetBSD components being named
 >   after companies.  This sets a bad precedent, and I envision a day
 >   when it won't be possible to even read documentation without seeing
 >   what is effectively advertising.  This was never done in the
 >   Berkeley days, either, even though many components (e.g. label
 >   support) were contributed wholesale.  NetBSD is an operating system,
 >   not an advertising medium.

"Berkeley Packet Filter"