--cvVnyQ+4j833TQvp
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 10:24:14AM +0200, Lucio De Re wrote:
> Itojun requested me, a while back, when I begged for some information,
> to report back or summarise my findings about such beasts.
>=20
> I eventually managed to get hold of a D-Link DFE-570TX 4-port Ethernet
> adapter (D-Link label it "Quad Channel Server Card") which exceeds my
> requirements considerably (10BaseT would have sufficed, 100BaseTX -
> the X is for full-duplex, is it not? - was overkill).

No... 100baseTX is a 100 encoding on 2 wire-pairs, 100baseT4 is an encoding
on 4 wire-pairs if I recall right, and there's 100base-Fsomethingorother
which uses fiber optic cables.

All 100 Mbit boards I know of can do full duplex.

Regards,
	-is

--cvVnyQ+4j833TQvp
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.i

iQEVAgUBOid5OzCn4om+4LhpAQH80Af/aaYg2abqKOxlm09cGnltqOrreRytpd5E
bgoFgOEkdx9TXyRwu1SkQxALbqYdNj/XjZTMavEnkOFZFh+RrutNI6CDOXVMsuIt
7fJDiS5JU9Qfl5IpCwqbizhTX/qIS5dR0eHLVO3Ru8M00VdHEyFzXiaD230FT+d2
K5ABZknvlIiK+2FLkM0HNijMmw16dk1CyVVw+rekSAxvNILXDnkc/EvqlibU5X3S
6Mrxdp6fCp8XENoSGz8Fio25SwxePwpwx2Ta2sIr481U1+E9pg81KJIDbCc62I5y
1X9JH4Oye++xlLK5PblUTGP9Osm+cIXDtX7cGDe9vT4l+5l8PQBWew==
=zaIJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--cvVnyQ+4j833TQvp--