Subject: Re: Reserved port range patches
To: None <tech-net@netbsd.org>
From: Matthias Scheler <tron@zhadum.de>
List: tech-net
Date: 08/24/2000 17:55:47
In article <20000824174426.3B1E02A2A@orchard.arlington.ma.us>,
	Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld@orchard.arlington.ma.us> writes:
> i wouldn't call these "reserved ports".  i'd call them "low range
> ports", to match the name of the socket option used to get one of them
> dynamically.

Ok, point taken. I'll use "net.inet.ip.lowportmin" and
"net.inet.ip.lowportmax" instead.

	Kind regards

-- 
Matthias Scheler                            http://www.sighardstrasse.de/~tron/