On Thu, Jul 13, 2000 at 03:31:43AM +0900, itojun@iijlab.net wrote:

 > 	i agree going to sockaddr_storage is the best solution.  however,
 > 	there are many places where type of "ro_dst" is assumed to be
 > 	sockaddr, like:
 > 		struct sockaddr *sa;
 > 		sa = &ro.ro_dst;
 > 	so i just worried about more gratuitous diffs due to the type change
 > 	and additional typecasts.

ok, how about:

struct route {
	struct rtentry *ro_rt;
	union {
		struct sockaddr roun_dst_sa;
		struct sockaddr_storage roun_dst_ss;
	} ro_un;
#define	ro_dst		ro_un.roun_dst_sa	/* compatiblity */
#define	ro_dst_sa	ro_un.roun_dst_ss
};

-- 
        -- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@zembu.com>