Subject: Re: ancillary data alignment and binary backward compatibility
To: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino <itojun@iijlab.net>
From: Chris G. Demetriou <cgd@netbsd.org>
List: tech-net
Date: 03/08/2000 08:32:03
> 	are you suggesting to have different CMSG_ALIGN (= have different
> 	ALIGNBYTES) for use in the kernel, based on binary emulation
> modes?

That's one possibility, probably the most sane.  (you don't want to
change the existing value for the sparc, because of binary
compatibility, and if sparc64's different, that's probably for a good reason.

> 	I'm not sure if this is possible for the kernel side to dance like
> 	this...

the kernel is just software.


cgd
-- 
Chris Demetriou - cgd@netbsd.org - http://www.netbsd.org/People/Pages/cgd.html
Disclaimer: Not speaking for NetBSD, just expressing my own opinion.