Subject: Re: ancillary data alignment and binary backward compatibility: please pick one
To: None <itojun@iijlab.net>
From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej@nas.nasa.gov>
List: tech-net
Date: 02/28/2000 10:03:56 
On Mon, 28 Feb 2000 21:42:37 +0900 
 itojun@iijlab.net wrote:

 > 	additional question: are sizeof(long) different on sparc32 and sparc64?
 > 	if so, routing socket alignment (ROUNDUP in sys/net/rtsock.c will
 > 	have the similar problem.

Yes.  sparc32 == ILP32, sparc64 == LP64.  Perhaps we need a general
__net_alignbytes() :-)

        -- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@nas.nasa.gov>