On Feb 23,  6:35pm, itojun@iijlab.net (itojun@iijlab.net) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: lib/libc/net/rcmd.c: solaris compatibility

| 
| >| 	again, I'm happy to bring this in.  It may be my fault to put
| >| 	function prototypes that assumes sa_len, for __ivaliduser_sa and
| >| 	others.  I just need to know proper (and easiest) way to deal with
| >| 	binary backward compatibility...
| >versioning them might be the easiest solution.
| 
| 	ooops.
| 	we do not have prototypes for __ivaliduser_sa and friends, since they
| 	are not really visible as proper API.  I can't do API versioning on it.

If you add them, then versioning will work. But where should they go?

christos