>>so i'd be tempted to do
>>    zone "0.0.ip6.int" { type master; file "0.0.ip6.int"; };
>
>	Please note that not everyting under ::/8 is for looopback.  There
>	are other usage (:: is for unspecified, ::ffff:10.1.1.1 is for
>	v4 mapped, ::10.1.1.1 is for v4 compatible).  Do you still prefer
>	::/8 (= 0.0.ip6.int.) to be declared in zone file?

imho, if you get an ipv4 mapped (or compatible) address and you look
it up in the ipv6 space, i think you're bound to lose anyway, right?

as for the unspecified address, you could put a name in for that too,
no?

i think it makes more sense if the names of the files are shorter, as
the name of the "127" file is now.  others may feel otherwise.

-- 
|-----< "CODE WARRIOR" >-----|
codewarrior@daemon.org             * "ah!  i see you have the internet
twofsonet@graffiti.com (Andrew Brown)                that goes *ping*!"
andrew@crossbar.com       * "information is power -- share the wealth."