On Fri, 2 Jul 1999, Manuel Bouyer wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 02, 1999 at 09:34:05AM -0700, Bill Studenmund wrote:
> > The thing with the routes is that NetBSD's routing uses a bit mask based
> > binary tree (the radix stuff). That works great with IP, where regions are
> > allocated in powers of two (i.e. you've got a foo/X address where X is a
> > number of bits).
> 
> Oh, so it will more hard than I though to change this to have a single-atalk
> route entrty. I'll probably don't try this.

Maybe, maybe not. Though I can't find it right now, I thought the route
code called the radix code though function pointers. Looking at the code,
I must be remembering things.

i.e. if an address family could use a different routing setup than IP's
radix code, we'd be set. :-)

I'm unsure how to do that now.

Take care,

Bill