Subject: Re: IPF state and spurious blocks
To: Darren Reed <darrenr@reed.wattle.id.au>
From: Michael Graff <explorer@flame.org>
List: tech-net
Date: 05/27/1999 22:52:31
Darren Reed <darrenr@reed.wattle.id.au> writes:
> > Isn't it a hash table of some sort?
>
> What it's stored in is immaterial, really. It should be created when ipf
> is enabled and destroyed when disabled. In between, why should the size
> be fixed ?
It's not trivial to grow a hash table, is it?
> echo 'block in on fxp0 proto 4 from any to any' | ipf -nvf -
Ahh, thanks. Sorry about (3) then :)
--Michael